Week #4 Post

Here is my link to Omeka.


Note that I put in the jpg of the physical text (which I scanned) to show the results of how accurate the ORC app was and to compare with the physical version.

Overview of the Process

This week in posts, we learned how to define and furthermore use optical Optical Character Recognition (OCR ) OCR software. in the context of research, it makes common sense why we would want to use OCR from a digital humanities perspective. In this generation, the need for physical texts for textbooks, libraries, scientific papers, or even scientific fiction novels is at a decline; digital copies are the new norm. Thus having a resource where we can convert physical texts comes in handy by converting physical to digital texts.

My experience with the TextScanner app provided a practical perspective on the accessibility and immediate benefits of OCR technology, along with its limitations. A comparative analysis with other OCR applications reveals that TextScanner’s user-friendly interface and cost-free model are particularly appealing for students and casual users. However, the app’s limitations, such as inaccurate text recognition, could significantly impact research accuracy and user experience. Discussing the balance between app monetization strategies, like advertisements, and user experience might offer insights into developing sustainable software without compromising functionality.

What worked well?

The main task that went well was finding good resources online and recommending good OCR apps. The main reason for me choosing TextScanner was mainly because it was solely an OCR functionality app and was free to use. It also was on IOS and not android so it offered better platform convivence. In addition, using the app and navigating its functions was also super simple and went well. TextScanner also had a great UI with simple features. However, the adds became unbearable after sometime.

What didn’t?

From my end, the process went smooth with no issues!

In addressing the question of what did not work well with the OCR process, it’s clear that while the personal experience with using the technology was smooth, there were notable limitations in the OCR application itself that impacted the quality of the output. These limitations highlight areas where OCR technology, particularly within the app used, can see improvement.

The accuracy and effectiveness of the OCR software were not without faults. The software struggled with correctly aligning text and occasionally misinterpreted words, which suggests a need for enhancement in its text recognition algorithms. This issue points to a fundamental challenge in OCR technology: accurately translating the varied fonts, sizes, and styles of physical text into a digital format without losing the integrity of the original document.

Moreover, the inability of the app’s “AI” to properly organize text into paragraphs and headings as indicated in the physical text underscores a gap in its capability to understand and replicate the structure of documents. This is a crucial aspect of digitization, especially for academic and professional use, where the organization of information is as important as the information itself.

Despite these challenges, the software managed to transcribe the words with only minor formatting errors. This achievement, while not flawless, demonstrates the potential of OCR technology to facilitate the digitization of texts, even if it currently falls short in some areas of precision and document structuring.

As OCR technology continues to evolve, it is anticipated that these issues will be addressed. With advancements in machine learning and artificial intelligence, OCR applications are expected to improve in recognizing and accurately converting a wider range of text formats and layouts. This progression will not only enhance the accuracy of text digitization but also the ability of software to maintain the original document’s formatting, thereby making OCR an increasingly valuable tool in digital document management and preservation.

Did you learn something new or useful during the process?

Absolutely, the exploration into OCR technology was very insightful! My search for an efficient OCR app that offered its services without a fee led me to discover the vast potential and current limitations of OCR technology. However, it is likely that OCR is on the verge of becoming a mainstream tool as the preference for digital texts over physical ones continues to grow. The process illuminated the fact that OCR is more than just a convenience; it’s a transformative tool for accessing and digitizing text. The realization that OCR technology is still evolving and has yet to be fully integrated into our digital habits suggests a future where its application could become ubiquitous, simplifying tasks that currently require manual transcription.

In terms of application across other areas of my academic and personal life, the discovery of the Google Notes app’s OCR plugin was particularly impactful. This feature is very effective of converting images or physical texts into useful notes with their AI plugin. As a student, the ability to convert textbook excerpts, notes, or any physical document into a digital format is invaluable. It streamlines the process of organizing study materials and ensures that important information is readily accessible.

Moreover, this technology holds promise for a wide range of applications beyond personal note-taking. In academic research. For example, OCR can facilitate the digitization of archival materials, making them more accessible for study and analysis. In everyday life, OCR can assist in managing personal documents, receipts, and even translating printed text for language learning or travel.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *